| Twilight - 2 Disc Special Edition [DVD] [2008] | ![Twilight - 2 Disc Special Edition [DVD] [2008]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41fCzcWGCcL._SL160_.jpg) | Director: Catherine Hardwicke
Studio: Contender Entertainment Group
Category: DVD
List Price: £22.99
Buy New: £5.46
as of 12/3/2010 09:54 CST details
You Save: £17.53 (76%)
New (26) Used (3) from £4.75
Seller: tiptop_seller
Rating:  407 reviews
Format: Anamorphic, PAL
Languages: English (Subtitled), English (Original Language)
Rating: Suitable for 12 years and over
Region: 2
Aspect Ratio: 1.78:1
Number Of Discs: 2
Running Time: 117 Minutes
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3
Dimensions (in): 7.4 x 5.4 x 0.6
EAN: 5030305512590
ASIN: B001O0DM2S
Theatrical Release Date: 2008
Release Date: April 6, 2009
Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk Review
The big-screen adaptation of Twilight, Stephenie Meyer's bestselling vampire romance, is aimed squarely at its key demographic: teen girls whose idea of Prince Charming is a brooding, pale, undead teen who could kill you instantly at any moment. Such a prince is more fascinating than frightening to new girl Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart), who moves to the rainy-gray town of Forks, Wash., to live with her dad (Billy Burke), the local sheriff who's puzzled by a series of "animal attacks." On her first day at school, Bella appears to (visibly) nauseate her lab partner, Edward (Robert Pattinson). Turns out the scent of her blood is this vampire's "brand of heroin," and his struggle not to kill her causes an irresistible pull toward her. Whether he's attracted for the normal reasons or because she smells especially sweet to him is vague in the book and even less clear on-screen; nonetheless, Bella falls hopelessly in love with Edward, which sets her on a dangerous path when a few nomad vampires show up in town, one particularly keen on tracking the human. Directed by Catherine Hardwicke (Thirteen), Twilight is full of funny moments--not all of which are intentional--and the casting, from Stewart to Bella's self-absorbed friend Jessica (Anna Kendrick) is spot-on. The weakest link, unfortunately, is Pattinson. While he certainly looks the part, his Edward could have used an extra injection of testosterone (Pattinson, who is British, used James Dean as a model for his American accent). In scenes where he growls about the temptation to kill those who would harm Bella, or flitting around a forest warning her how dangerous he is, he comes off more like a whimpering puppy than a debonair monster. The good news is, his chemistry with Stewart (particularly in their big kissing scene) is palpable, which, let's face it, is really what matters to Twilight fans most. --Ellen A. Kim
|
| Customer Reviews:
 Twilight the movie, an outsiders perspective February 2, 2009
Anne Quinlan (Ireland)
162 out of 179 found this review helpful
I had never read the Twilight books when I went to see the movie. I vaguely remember the hype of Breaking Dawn's release, but it didn't mean anything to me. I saw the queues for the opening of the film and it meant nothing to me, apart from about 3000 people in Dublin being stupid enough to queue for hours in the rain to see a film.
I love vampires and werewolves though, so, at a loose end one weekend, I convinced my boyfriend that it wasnt a horror, and there was nothing else to do. we laughed for about the first hour. it was very funny. But by the middle of the tree top scene I was hooked. we both were.
I rushed home and ordered all four books that night. I read the series straight through twice, and dragged my mom to see the film with me. (I'm in my mid 20's, she's considerably older....)I sat, completely unmoving the whole way through the move. it was like I was greeting old friends. once I knew the story, all of the humour went out of the film, and it became totally engrossing. my mom thought so too.
lots of little things were changed, obviously. the book is better. obviously. I didnt like Stewert (?) as Bella. she played her as too self assured, too graceful. it wasnt Bella for me. But Pattinson brought Edward to life in a way that was so different. I actually liked him more after seeing the film that in the books.
Kellan Lutz is missing the dimples and curls but hes still the same adorable, deep as a puddle Emmet we all love.
the film is more of a companion to the book, it makes the scenery solid. I thought that was actually a plus of the movie, I knew what the characters looked like, I was a little fuzzy on what their neighbourhood was like. the film filled that in. when midnight Sun is published the three will stand together to give a 360 view of Bella and the Cullens world.
WIll I buy the DVD? yes. WIll I watch it a million times, of course. but I'll read the books one million and one ;)
 Inferior Fang Flick! October 22, 2009
Ms. K. L. Bradshaw-howard (London)
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
Ah... twilight. I picked this film up on a whim as I like Vampire films and literature. I haven't read the books, so I have no loyalty to the franchise. Similarly, I can't be upset by differences between the two versions.
However, I was saddened to discover that this isn't really much of a Vampire film at all, it's a bunch of angst-ridden romantic twaddle, clearly aimed at a female audiance younger than I, and their mums, with a light dusting of Vampiric characters/mythology/hokum here and there.
As I watched, I found it impossible to identify with or care for any of the characters; but persevered to the end, in case it improved. Sadly, it didn't.
I know I'll probably get savaged by fans of the franchise for this review, but I can only speak from my own experience, and this film did nothing for me; and I feel like I've wasted £13 on it. I guess that'll teach me for buying without investigating! And, as I said, it's obvious that I'm not even the intended target demographic.
I'd urge any fellow Vamp-fans looking for a tasty fang-fix to stick with the brilliant True Blood (for which I don't have enough good to say), Let The Right One In (stunning), and the usual list of classic Vampire movies & literature, even the Buffy TV show is considerably better - and leave this one to angsty teenage girls (and their mums, can't leave you lovely ladies out!).
 Brilliant and disappointing, both at the same time. January 7, 2009
down-right-mysical (England)
201 out of 227 found this review helpful
Yes, of course if you've read the books you should definitely go see the movie. And yes, you will probably enjoy it. BUT, that said, as a book-to-movie adaptation, of course it could also be better.
Personally, I always wonder where they find the screenwriters who're crazy enough to take on a job like this. No matter what you do, no matter how faithful you are to the book, or conversely how much you change it, very, very rarely is a film version ever better than the novel that stemmed it. Twilight is no exception.
Certainly, it has it's good points. The casting, for one, I think is exceptional: while I had some qualms before I saw it, I loved all the actors, and wouldn't change a single one. They have their moments, of course, but for a young cast they're really rather impressive, particularly Robert Pattinson: I'm disappointed Catherine Hardwicke wouldn't let him play the part as 'dark' as he wanted to.
And that, I think, is where most of the problems with this film lie: with Hardwicke, its director, and Melisssa Rosenberg, it's screenwriter. For starters, I can't help but question Rosenberg's credentials. She's written a lot for TV, but only one other screenplay to date (that being 'Step Up', of all things) and sure, everyone's got to start somewhere... but with one of the biggest films of the year? Maybe not.
I can't fathom many of the changes Rosenberg made. Adding in scenes like the extra scenes with the 'bad' vampires, thus shifting the films emphasis from the 'love story' to the 'action' or 'horror' factor, or like the entirely pointless Biology trip (the conversation that took place there could easily have happened in its original setting), and shifting the order of scenes... the entire Port Angeles scene was thrown out of sync by the fact that Bella did not find out Edward was a vampire until after. And then when she planned to confront him, she went off into the forest with him, not knowing he was 'vegetarian'! In the book, I never thought of Bella as crazy... in the film, I can't help but question it. I simply do not understand the need to change things like that, which would have been so much better if left as they originally were.
Then there's the fact that both Rosenberg and Hardwicke seem greatly preoccupied with showing of the 'scenery' of the the American Northwest. Great, so there are lots of trees. We don't need to see Bella and Edward running off into the woods and climbing trees (besides the point that Edward would never let Bella do that anyway because he'd be too scared of Bella falling out of one), because its supposed to be from Bella's perspective... and Bella doesn't like the great out doors and Forks, in her opinion is far too 'green'. So, skip the theatrics, and give us the love story.
But, err... what love story? If you have not read the books, you could call Bella and Edward's romance entire non-sensical. They've barely talked to each other, and suddenly they're saying 'I'm only afraid of losing you' or 'you're my life now'. Although, never once do they say 'I love you'. And isn't that what it's really supposed to be about? The ultimate love story. Sadly, it's not.
But,all that said, i will see the film again, and I will be buying it on DVD because the essence of Stephenie Meyers work is still there. The plot is still good, the characters still similiar (though Bella is more annoying), and Kristen Stewart and Rob Pattinson do have good chemistry, they're just not given enough chance to prove it.
I really hope they do better with examining the love story in 'New Moon'... but seeing as there's less of it, I really doubt it.
You've read it, you must see it, but be prepared for disappointment August 23, 2009
A Reader's Voice (Scotland)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
If you haven't read the book(s) then I doubt this film will make sense, or bring enjoyment.
If you've read the book(s), and you are like me, then you should see the film just to see how someone else has visualised the story.
In my opinion, the books work because of how you as the reader can imagine Edward and his vampire family. The books are by no means great but let's face it: the vampires are painfully beautiful and they are powerful - a great canvas to project your own romantic fantasies onto.
Of course in a film, the personal projection is taken away (you see the actors) and what you're left with is the story. Sadly, the filmmakers didn't manage to create a (love) story that draws you in. They've focused on Edward's self-loathing for being what he considers a 'monster' which is hinted at in the book but is not the dominating description of this character there. What you end up with is a very awkward vampire experiencing 'vampire angst' - but not enough to turn this into a meaningful story in itself.
The love story between the Edward and human Bella isn't explained or illustrated through scenes per se either. Rather, the film attempts to communicate the attraction through what I assume are meant to be smoldering looks and expressions of internal conflict. As you can probably guess, that didn't work for me at all.
I'd like to add that I watched this film in the cinema at an early evening showing together with about 85% teenagers under 14 (no teen myself). We ALL laughed, and I don't think the film means to be funny.
Am I going to see 'New Moon' the week it comes out? You bet your life I will.
Great film.....don't compare to the book February 25, 2009
Ms. S. Jolly-hart (Leeds)
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I loved this film, thought the casting was great and loved the mood.
Although if you've not seen it but read the books try not to compare them. Books are always going to be a lot better as they can be more descriptive.
It was however a great film in itself. Being a vampire lover it is nice to be able to see them during the day, even if it is overcast.
In keeping with vampire lore though...they maybe a bit too nice but then again it is aimed at teenage girls.
|
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON EU S.à.r.l. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
www.ebay.co.uk
Copyright Thalasar Ventures
| |
![The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2 Disc Special Edition) [DVD] [2009]](http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B002BSGXIM.01._AA75_PU_PU-5_.jpg)
![Twilight - 2 Disc Special Edition [DVD] [2008]](http://pics.ebaystatic.com/aw/pics/navbar/eBayLogoTM.gif)
