The Golden Compass [2007] | ![The Golden Compass [2007]](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51%2BkTzME3xL._SL160_.jpg)
enlarge | Director: Chris Weitz Actors: Nicole Kidman, Daniel Craig, Dakota Blue Richards, Ben Walker, Freddie Highmore Studio: Entertainment in Video Category: DVD
List Price: £19.99 Buy New: £9.75 You Save: £10.24 (51%)
New (33) Used (8) Collectible (1) from £8.00
Rating: 66 reviews
Format: Pal Language: English (Unknown) Rating: Parental Guidance Region: 2 Number Of Discs: 1 Running Time: 109 Minutes Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.3 Dimensions (in): 7.4 x 5.4 x 0.6
EAN: 5017239195600 ASIN: B0010X8FLM
Theatrical Release Date: 2007 Release Date: April 28, 2008 (New: Last 30 Days) Availability: Usually dispatched within 1-2 business days Condition: New.
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.co.uk Review Perhaps it didn't ignite the box office in quite the way it'd been hoped, but that's little reason to pass over the qualities of The Golden Compass now it arrives on DVD. Based on the Phillip Pullman novel His Dark Materials--itself the start of the Northern Lights trilogy, the film isn't without a few problems, but emerges as a quality adaptation. And you certainly can't fault The Golden Compass for sheer ambition. The story, for those new to the series, is primarily that of 12-year old Lyra, who is in search of her friend who has been kidnapped. Naturally, this proves to be quite a challenging adventure, not least because it's through Pullman's vividly imagined world, crossing dimensions as Lyra travels. The film, while toning down and fiddling with some elements of the source material, stays quite close to the book, and it proves to be a good, if not Lord Of The Rings-standard, adaptation. What helps The Golden Compass, on top of the strong effects work and scope of the production, is a solid cast, featuring the likes of Daniel Craig, Nicole Kidman and Dakota Blue Richards. And it certainly whets the appetite for the next instalment in the series. Whether the muted box office returns put pay to that remains to be seen: for now, at least, The Golden Compass is a good, solid family movie that's easy to enjoy. --Jon Foster
|
| Customer Reviews:
Far from golden April 16, 2008 J. T. Houlston-hope (England) 47 out of 58 found this review helpful
Watching the first adaptation of Philip Pullman's excellent trilogy is one part admiration and two parts disappointment. First off, you have to admire the courage of director Chris Weitz, who took in the scope and ambition of these novels, stepped forward from the pack and bravely took the wheel of this vehicle into his hands. Unfortunately, once we were done patting him on the back for that, there's no avoiding the bitter disappointment of realising that our drive has bitten off far more than his ability can chew, and we are being catapulted, arms up and screaming, off of the road. The truth is that there is so much wrong with this movie that its hard to keep your chin up for it. First off, Ian "if its fantasy I'm compulsory" Mckellen is disgracefully miscast as key character, Iorek Brynison. As Pullman presented him, Iorek is a young, energetic prince that has lost his way, desperately in need of the inadvertent guidance Lyra (our heroine) offers. Mckellen (inevitably) presents Iorek as an aging, disposed king looking to reclaim his long-lost kingdom. This is far enough off the mark to make the character practically unrecognisable to fans of the book (or at least to me) though this of course will not be an issue for those coming to the film without preconceptions. Secondly, the script is just awful. Hollywood fat-cats only know how several previous rewrites were discarded in favour of this nonsense. Granted, there are a sea of concepts to convey, but so much of the dialogue is descriptive that any attempt to suspend disbelief is broken long before it can gather steam. For example, Lyra bangs her knee and her daemon, Pantalaimon, protests "Careful Lyra, Don't you know that if you get hurt, I hurt too!" Of course she bloody knows! She's twelve years old!! Is this the first time she's experienced any sensory perception whatsoever!!? honestly. This sort of thing could have been done so much more subtly and the film is so rife with similar examples that by the time two hours was through I was raw from it. Needless to say this has a direct effect on the performances, which despite the talent on show are almost uniformly wooden and poor. The audience in the cinema were made so uncomfortable watching the cast wade through this verbal tripe that my first viewing of the second matrix film was brought to mind. The actors on the screen before you so clearly don't believe in their dialogue or environment that you are left with a brutally clear perception of a series of short set pieces. As the camera fades from each moment you can almost here the director screaming "Cut! Alright lets do it again." In short there is no fluidity at all and no possibility of getting swept along in the performances. Finally, even the direction manages to strip Pullmans' world of much its grandeur and scope. You get no sense of the majesty, spritualism and influence of the witches (the actually well cast Eva Green is criminally underused as Witch-Queen Serefina Pekkela) and the set piece battles lack any urgency or sense of scale whatsoever. Remember when the orks marched on Helm's deep in the two towers? It was absolutely terrifying. I was crawling up my chair. Contrast that with the battle at the end of the Golden Compass and its easy to see how far this film has fallen from the required mark. The battle here lacks any sense of scale, importance or consequence. Worst of all the frame is so sparsely populated, driven and focussed that we are sadly given the sense that this is more of a mere skirmish, helping Lyra to escape. It looks like a fight in an alpine pub car park. Again, bitterly disappointing. I won't even get started on the decision to play down the religious aspects or how on earth the producers intend to make this work in the second and third books where this emerges as the overriding drive of the plot. How on earth the death of god and the acsendancy of Metatron can be reinterpreted escapes me entirely. I sense an almighty fudge coming. Its sad because there is otherwise much here to be admired. Lyra's world is for the briefest of moments through out the film beautifully realised and the animation of the daemons at least is a triumph. There's no doubting the effort. Casting man of the moment Daniel Craig was also a clever decision and hopefully he and Nicole Kidman can combine for something of a success story in the second and third films- assuming they are ever made. The truth is that this film has been on it way for years, riding a fever pitch of anticipation, and there is no hiding the sadness and disillusionment of the Pullman faithful to see what has become of the first instalment. Forget lord of the rings- think phantom menace. And how sorry I am to say so.
Amazing !!!! December 30, 2007 Charlie Edwards (England) 21 out of 32 found this review helpful
As a fan of the books who has read them all about ten times I was really excited when I heard the film was coming out. However, I was worried that it would ruin the book for me. I found it an amazing film though. True, it wasn't as good as the book, but what film is? The film kept all the main aspects of the book in it, and the characters seemed to me just like they were represented in the book. The actors were brilliant and the special effects were outstanding!!! My only complaint is that it had the title of the American book!!! I recommend this to everyone whether they have read the books or not as it is truly magical and I can't wait for the Subtle Knife !!!
a lesson to learn before book 2 reaches the screen February 28, 2008 Lady K (West Country England) 16 out of 21 found this review helpful
Only one comment. The producers and directors of this series need to talk to Peter Jackson urgently about how to bring a long complex and enthralling trilogy to the screen. On the evidence of the first instalment the current team have only the sketchiest idea of how it's done which is a great shame as the books are outstanding and deserve the same kind of attention to detail and characterisation, as well as a faithful adaptation of the plot! that made the Lord of the Rings trilogy so fantastic. If you haven't read the books you won't know what you're missing so give it ago or better yet read the books! If you have read them then don't bother watching this film as it will just frustrate and disappoint
Missed opportunity March 18, 2008 M. G. Wilson (Eastbourne) 13 out of 16 found this review helpful
Reviewing a film when you've read the book is always hard. Really a film should be judged on its own merits - does it work as a film - and not on how well it compares with the original book. Hard though that is to do, my view would be that this would be an unsatisfactory film even without taking account of its shortcomings as an adaptation. The acting is acceptable, the effects ok but nothing special, but I'm really not sure that the story, told this way, makes sense. Shorn of all its meaning, and presented as a simple 'and then and then and then' narrative it even manages to be something which the original novels could never be accused of - boring.
My advice? Don't waste your time and money. If you haven't already read the books, they would be a better investment. If you have, the film is likely to be an unsatisfactory and frustrating experience.
The most disappointing book adaptation I have seen February 24, 2008 Steve Mogg (West Sussex, UK.) 12 out of 19 found this review helpful
This film may pass for entertainment if you haven't read the book but I felt hugely let down. Reading about the torturous birth of the movie, i suppose I shouldn't be surprised. Directors leaving, replaced and then replaced again is not a good omen. I found the characters thinly sketched, the acting so-so, the effects iffy (technical term) and the pacing off target. All the mystery, excitement and energy present in the novel is missing and the story is mangled beyond recognition and respect for the author. Finally and unforgivably, a 'Hollywood' ending replaces the original thereby removing one the essential plot themes. Like Frankensteins monster, this stitched together creation from seemingly disparate parts, lumbers about for a while before someone (presumably in the editing suite) decided enough was enough and spliced in the end credits.
|
|
|
|